Fastly, Inc. Class A Common Stock Piper Sandler 5th Annual Growth Frontiers Conference
Review the key takeaways and the transcript of this earnings call.
- Fastly reported $183 million of revenue last quarter, up 23% year over year.
- Delivery services revenue grew 17% year over year, security revenue grew 43% year over year, and other revenue, primarily compute, also contributed to broad-based demand.
- RPO grew 38% year over year last quarter, while current RPO grew 44%.
- Fastly reported a 117% net retention rate in its last quarter, which management described as a four-year high.
- Bot management and DDoS grew triple digits year over year, while WAF remained Fastly’s strongest security product.
- Fastly’s compute business had 96% gross margin flow through over the last 12 months.
STOCKNOW INSIGHTS
Continue with outlook and guidance.
Log in to unlock executive comments and Q&A highlights.
Log in for the full summaryStockNow uses AI to translate and summarize earnings calls. Accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed.
Transcript
Preview the first fifteen paragraphs, organized by speaker.
Awesome. Well, thanks for joining us everybody. Jim Fish with Piper Sandler. I know we've got lunch coming up here shortly, but I have the privilege of chatting with Rich and Vern of Fastly ahead of this little analyst day. We'll just do all the analyst day presentation right now, if you don't mind. But thanks for joining us. I've got a bunch of questions to run through, and I'll open it up if we've got some time at the end, if anyone in the audience has one. Rich, it's been a year at Fastly.
Great. This was the first conference you had when you first joined, so appreciate you being back.
One of the things that we're asking across companies this week is just how does the IT spending landscape look like across your install base? What's going on in terms of the impact of AI on budgets, whether it's from the delivery and networking side of things, or even the security side for you guys?
Sure. I think overall, I think we're continuing to see strong, healthy demand for the spend that our customers are spending. We did 23% year-over-year growth, $183 million last quarter. And it was broad-based. It was actually across the three different revenue lines that we do, right? So delivery services grew 17% year over year. We had security growing 43% year over year, and we have other, which is primarily our compute. I think that from a demand perspective, we see it broad-based across all three areas. And we're also seeing, especially given the component shortages that are happening, customers willing to make more commitments. And so we see that transpire in the RPO and the CRPO. So you'll see that the RPO grew 38% last quarter on a year-over-year basis. And then our current portion of the RPO grew 44%.
I would just say continued strong demand and pretty consistently across all the products and within even the willingness to do commits.
Got it. I always think about delivery business as two subsegments, really. One being the media use case that Fastly historically was known for, whether it's streaming or gaming. Obviously, some excitement with that this year in terms of some of the periodic events.
Episodic events. Episodic, sorry. Episodic.
Then the web delivery. That's right.
acceleration side. Is there a way to think about the mix in terms of the bytes or the revenue or the business just generally in terms of that split?
Yeah, actually, really good question. Historically, we've been very strong on the live events, streaming side of it, because it's just more complex. Customers really depend on reliability. They rely on being consistently there, having the network built, and we tend to win where performance matters. As a result, we've always historically been strong there just because it's been really good. I would say that the portfolio has really built out to your point, which is now the delivery has that side, and then we have what we call the full site delivery. On the full site delivery side, those are the e-commerce sites, the hospitality, the different market segments that we sell into. I would say that growth and demand continues to be strong in both. I think that on the first side, we continue to still be better than our competitors on reliability, fewer outages.
We just consistently show up for our customers there. I would say that with the complexity of the traffic that's happening, we're seeing a lot of demand on the full site delivery. When I say complexity of the traffic, there's just more machine traffic now with bots and DDoS attacks getting more complicated. You see full site delivery customers who really want a broader suite and being able to protect them, and thinking traffic is the front door to a lot of that. Then I think that more and more with agentic, there's a lot of demand even for Compute, and so you see that play out with that other side. I'd say broad-based strength on both sides of the market.
Yeah. On that point, I guess, what are you seeing on the impact of agentic on overall traffic at this point? How is Fastly capturing that opportunity?
The way I look at agentic and the way even AI traffic is, there is a difference on the traffic side from a gigabytes transferred and the number of requests that come in. I would say that we published articles that talked about machine traffic being 6.5 times as fast as human traffic. That is measured on a request basis. The number of requests from machine to machine, it is really high and it is growing faster, and it is almost half of the total request traffic that we see overall, but it is still a very small portion of gigabytes transferred. It is hard to compare when you are doing 4K video or live demand video on high definition. Those are just big gigabytes of transferred data that is being transferred. I think that there is a difference between the two.
I would say the way AI and agentic is playing out for us, the nearest term beneficiary and the tailwind we see is in security side. With the proliferation of machine traffic, there is just more customer demand for, "Hey, is that good traffic or bad traffic? How do you block that when it comes out?" We see the benefits in DDoS, and then we see the benefit in Bot Management. Monetization models are getting altered and impacted. Our customers are demanding those two. I think the nearest term impact is security, and specifically with Bot Management and DDoS products. I would say that longer term, the beneficiary tailwind from AI would probably be in the compute side. I just think that the edge has a bigger role to play with AI.
Right now, the edge is relatively small for frontier models because they sit all in the central cloud, they do not sit at the edge. As more agentic machine-to-machine, agents-to-agents working together, a lot of that should be happening at the edge. I do think that over time, AI and agentic will end up having a bigger play at the edge.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Continue the full translated transcript in StockNow.
Log in to unlock every statement, the English original, and speaker-by-speaker history.
Log in for the full transcriptCall participants
3 people spoke on this call — only 1 are shown here.
PARTICIPANT LIST
View participant details in StockNow.
Log in to see executives and analysts, their roles, and complete speaking history.
Log in to view all participantsKeep exploring
