Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc. Common StockIMDX
Recorded

Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc. Common Stock KOL event

Review the key takeaways and the transcript of this earnings call.

Period 0Duration1 hr 7 minParticipants9

Transcript

Preview the first fifteen paragraphs, organized by speaker.

Operator

Good morning, and welcome to the Insight Molecular Diagnostics virtual session. We will follow the formal presentation and fireside chat. If you would like to submit a question, you may do so by using the Q&A text box at the bottom of the webcast player. To our analysts joining us live, please use the raise hand feature to indicate you have a question. As a reminder, this call is being recorded, and a replay will be made available on the website following the conclusion of the event. I would now like to turn the call over to Josh Riggs, Chief Executive Officer at Insight Molecular Diagnostics.

Josh RiggsCEO

Please go ahead, Josh. Thanks, Sarah, and welcome everybody.

Josh RiggsCEO

We are going to just do one quick slide on forward-looking statements. All right, there they are. Thank you. We can move forward. Last year, we did our first KOL call, with Dr. Anthony Langone of Vanderbilt University, about how blood-based DNA tests have made it easier to manage kidney transplant patients. Now, our test, GraftAssureDx, is working its way through the FDA for exactly that indication. After we finish with kidney, our team is preparing to start work on a claims expansion into heart. Today, we are grateful to have transplant cardiologist, Dr. Max Lebo of Loyola University, on to talk about how these types of tests are used to manage heart transplant patients here in the U.S. Thank you, Dr. Lebo, for joining and offering to share some of your time and expertise.

Josh RiggsCEO

Guiding us through the conversation will be our very own Dr. Nick Ioannou, our Vice President of Medical Affairs, to whom I will now turn the call over.

Nick LoannouVP of Medical Affairs

Thank you. Thank you, Josh.

Nick LoannouVP of Medical Affairs

Josh started by telling us what was happening a year ago with Dr. Kenneth, who came and talked about kidney transplants. I want to start by telling you what was happening about 10 years ago when I started talking to my fellow colleagues, transplant nephrologists, transplant cardiologists, about these donor-derived cell-free DNA tests. Ultimately, most of them, when I was in there talking to them about these tests, they were saying, "These are great tests. Will we be able to do these here in our labs?" The answer back then was no. But you know what? Now that answer is yes. I want to walk you through, I want to take about 5 minutes, maybe even less, then walk you through some milestones, probably like seven dates, how heart transplant has evolved.

Nick LoannouVP of Medical Affairs

It starts off back in 1967 when the first heart transplant was performed by a fellow South African colleague, Dr. Christiaan Barnard. After that, heart transplant became pretty common. Many hearts were transplanted, but the problem is there was a lot of rejection due to the body's immune system protecting itself. It would see a foreign heart, and it would say, "This is not part of me. I have to reject it." In 1983, things changed because in 1983, the FDA approved cyclosporine, and that drug works by suppressing the body's immune system. This led to an increase in heart transplantation rates. The health of the newly transplanted hearts is monitored by performing biopsies. These biopsies, also known as endomyocardial biopsies, where a catheter is inserted from one of the veins and it removes pieces of heart for microscopic examination.

Nick LoannouVP of Medical Affairs

There's 3 to 5 samples that are removed, and the pathologists look at those, and they can tell if there's biopsy or not. Now, that first year after a heart transplant, on average, it's between 14 to 18 biopsies. Only in that first year. There's a lot of biopsies that are happening in that first year. Between 2019 and 2023, there were prospective multi-center trials that validated donor-derived cell-free DNA as a biomarker for acute rejection. In 2022, expert review by the American College of Cardiology highlighted donor-derived cell-free DNA as a promising non-invasive alternative to endomyocardial biopsies. In 2024, as per the SRTR, the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, there were 4,636 heart transplants performed in the U.S.A. Max and I have known each other for a while now. Max, I'm going to ask you a few questions.

Nick LoannouVP of Medical Affairs

You're here because you're the expert, so please tell us how you guys are doing these things. My first question is, at your center, prior to donor-derived cell-free DNA testing, how many protocol biopsies were performed that first year on your patients?

Max LieboTransplant Cardiologist

Thank you. A great question, Nick, and thanks for giving me a heads up on it. I actually was able to pull out our old protocols because it's been a while since we've only performed biopsies where we haven't used some non-invasive form of doing rejection surveillance. As of about a decade ago, our protocol would entail, I think it was 17 biopsies, heart biopsies, within the first year alone. The protocol continues on through 5 years post-transplant. Ultimately, these would just be surveillance biopsies. Each patient would be subjected to 26 invasive procedures during the first 5 years, just by protocol for surveillance. That doesn't include for-cause biopsies that are indicated by a clinical change in the patient that is concerning for rejection, as opposed to just doing surveillance.

Nick LoannouVP of Medical Affairs

Great. Max, thanks, and especially thank you for telling us about the for-cause and the surveillance biopsies and differentiating there. Most of us, I think you are the only cardiologist on this call, so most of us are not cardiologists. Please help us understand, after you get that positive biopsy, what is the process? What is your treatment regimen?

Max LieboTransplant Cardiologist

So depending on a number of different things, the short of it is we will almost always going to treat for rejection. If a biopsy shows that somebody is having rejection, there are two main forms of acute rejection. You could either have purely cellular rejection, which is the white blood cells themselves are mounting in a direct attack on the heart muscle. Or you could have antibody-mediated rejection, which is another acute form of rejection where it is really the antibodies that are not white blood cells but are created by white blood cells. It is the antibodies themselves that go and basically plant a flag on the heart and notify the body that this is a foreigner. Either one of those forms of rejection can either occur by themself or can be mixed picture.

Max LieboTransplant Cardiologist

Depending on which kind of rejection somebody is having, they are going to be getting treated for at least, at a minimum, three days in the hospital. But usually it would be closer to a week, especially if it were treated for antibody rejection. And they get treated with IV steroids, or for antibody rejection, we would be treating with even more invasive things like plasmapheresis, which is essentially like a large dialysis machine that is used to strain all the antibodies out of the patient. That, along with forms of chemotherapy that are used to prevent antibodies from occurring. So the treatments are pretty aggressive, and they are warranted if somebody is having rejection. But I guess what I would say is the actual number of biopsies that come back positive for rejection is not very high compared to the number of biopsies we do.

Max LieboTransplant Cardiologist

Ultimately, we do a lot of these invasive procedures to identify on surveillance testing rejection that would warrant treatment. It has really been over the last decade or more now, about 13, 15 years now, we have had these different forms of molecular testing that we can use for non-invasive surveillance to really limit the number of biopsies we have to do in order to identify that patient who does warrant treatment.

Nick LoannouVP of Medical Affairs

Wonderful. Hey, thanks for walking us through that. Thanks for touching on the second question I was thinking of asking. How long have you been using donor-derived cell-free DNA? That's good, about 15 years, 12-15 years you said.

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Continue the full translated transcript in StockNow.

Log in to unlock every statement, the English original, and speaker-by-speaker history.

Log in for the full transcript

More recent earnings calls

View earnings calendar