West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. Morgan Stanley 24th Annual Global Healthcare Conference
Review the key takeaways and the transcript of this earnings call.
Transcript
Preview the first fifteen paragraphs, organized by speaker.
Amazing. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to day one of the Morgan Stanley 24th Annual Global Healthcare Conference. I'm Karan Tushar, I'm the life sciences analyst here at Morgan Stanley. Really pleased today to be joined by Bob McMahon, CFO of West Pharmaceutical Services. Thanks, Bob, for being here.
Thank you for having me. It's a pleasure, and looking forward to the conversation.
Amazing. Just before we get started, for disclosures relating to this presentation, please see morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures. Bob, maybe we can dive straight in. Q2 results for the second consecutive quarter came in ahead of the top end of the guidance range. You obviously had the cyber incident during the quarter. Maybe just talk us through what you saw as the quarter evolved across the months, and how those drivers of growth compared to perhaps relative to your prior expectations.
Yeah, we were really pleased with how Q2 shaped up. Despite the fact of the cyber incident, we were able to overcome that and actually beat expectations, as you mentioned. Overall, we grew 13% on the top line, beating our expectations. What was really exciting to see is all business segments grew. That 13% was really led by our HVP business, which is almost 50% of our total revenues now. That grew 18%, with both GLP-1s and non-GLP-1s contributing. Our drug delivery device business actually and HVP drove the majority of the beats. We were actually able to overcome the cyber incident. We continue to see very solid and robust demand throughout the quarter.
Actually, obviously, May was a bit of a softer month, but we really came back in June as we ramped up the facilities. All the work that we have been putting in to drive additional capacity and utilization in our HVP plants really came to bear in second quarter. Drug delivery device also grew very nicely. Some of that was actually our stocking associated with the SmartDose in advance of the transaction. But if you even take that out, we still grew double digits in the rest of the business, and standard core business was up one. I would say our West Vantage business was up 1%. That was the one area that we still had some lingering effects of the cyber incident. Just based on the way that business is geared, you can't catch up as fast.
We do expect that about $7 million of revenues to catch up in Q3 and Q4. Overall, a very solid quarter. As a result of that strong Q2, we actually raised our full-year guidance to 10%-11% organic for the full year. That's up 250 basis points at the midpoint. So continued solid demand, and a good start to the year. Got a second half here and we're optimistic about continuing to execute.
Amazing. Focusing on the GLP-1 HVP growth, I think it's where 90% of my questions- Yeah come from anyway, from investors.
So remained really strong year-over-year. Bit of a sequential deceleration. Can we maybe just clarify some of the moving pieces here? I know you disclose a rounded percent of revenues for GLP-1s. I think there may have been some prior period reclassifications. So maybe we can just clear that up before we jump into some more specifics.
Our GLP-1 business continues to perform very well for us. If you look at it for the first half of the year, it led to growth across our business, high teens in Q2, as you mentioned. We have just rounded up to 10% of revenues in the quarter. As you mentioned, we did have a small classification from non-GLP-1 to GLP-1. HVP was clean, $34 million in Q2 of last year. I would also say, as we did have the cyber incident, we had to change and adjust our production plan that we had at the beginning of the year to ensure that customers did not have any stock-outs. I think if you take these things into account, we are not concerned about the performance of our GLP-1 business. We expect it to continue to drive very strong growth.
When you think about, and I am sure we will talk about this, the overall market for GLP-1s, we are still very early innings in our view, not only here in the U.S., but around the globe, particularly when we think about the next generation, the biosimilars that are coming along, as well as the continued penetration of the existing products that are on market.
Little impact from the cyber incident on the GLP-1 business in Q2, and that comes back in the Yeah.
Back half of the year. Okay, got it. That is really helpful. Just on that implied GLP HVP guide for the rest of the year, does imply a pretty sharp deceleration, despite the demand drivers being very resilient. Should we just attribute that to conservatism or are there stocking or pricing factors we should be keeping in mind?
Yeah. As we've done all year, we've got an upside bias to our forecast for GLP-1. I would say, there's nothing fundamentally that we see in the market that has changed, and feel good about the rest of the year for GLP-1s.
And we'll soon be seeing those next-gen GLP-1s enter the market, arguably more biologically complex than the molecules we saw earlier on. Should that be viewed as a positive mix shift for the higher-end HVPs, like the NovaPure and Westar range? Then we'd run some maths on that premiumization. Felt like it could be maybe 100 to 150 basis points added to that CAGR out to 2030. But what's your just early impression of those next-gen GLP-1s?
Yeah. I think one of the things that we are really excited about is not only the continued indications of the existing products that are on market, which is going to continue to expand just the number of patients that are eligible for these products. But to your point, the next-generation products are more biologically complex. And what does that mean for us? That means typically, that they would have a higher HVP product, could have a barrier coat on, which would actually increase the economics of a more sensitive molecule that creates either a FluroTec barrier coat, which the current products don't have, or a NovaPure, which both of those would be higher than the current economics. So when we think about that, not only is it good for patients, it's good economics for us and good economics for our customers. So we're very excited about that.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Continue the full translated transcript in StockNow.
Access every statement, the English original, and speaker-by-speaker history with StockNow Pro.
View the full transcript with ProCall participants
2 people spoke on this call — only 1 are shown here.
PARTICIPANT LIST
View participant details in StockNow.
Log in to see executives and analysts, their roles, and complete speaking history.
Log in to view all participantsKeep exploring
