Revvity, Inc.RVTY
Recorded

Revvity, Inc. 2026 Global Healthcare Conference

Review the key takeaways and the transcript of this earnings call.

Period 2026Duration28 minParticipants2

Transcript

Preview the first fifteen paragraphs, organized by speaker.

Robert BambergerSenior Research Analyst

Good morning, everyone. My name is Robbie Bamberger, Senior Research Analyst covering life sciences and diagnostic. I am very pleased to be joined this morning by Steve Willoughby, Senior VP of Investor Relations at Revvity. Steve, thanks for making the trip.

Robert BambergerSenior Research Analyst

Yeah. Before we get into segment specifics on the company, would you just mind giving us a quick breakdown snapshot of the company coming off of Q2 earnings print?

Robert BambergerSenior Research Analyst

What went right in the quarter, and anything you would like to just point out to investors about the quarter in general?

Steve WilloughbySenior VP of Investor Relations

Sure. Thanks for having me, first of all. Maybe just a quick overview of the company for those who are not familiar. Revvity, a couple of years ago, was previously known as PerkinElmer. We divested 30% of the company, including the PerkinElmer brand name, rebranded as Revvity in the middle of 2023. Revvity today is in the life science tools and diagnostics industry, and what I like to say is what we do in life science tools and what we do in diagnostics is typically a little bit different than other publicly traded companies. So, specialty diagnostics and then on the life science tools side, really focused in preclinical R&D, providing instruments, consumable software that are used by academic and pharma biotech customers to really drive innovative science, which I am sure we will get into.

Steve WilloughbySenior VP of Investor Relations

As it pertains to the second quarter, the second quarter for us overall was better than anticipated, I would say sort of top to bottom line. Revenue, organic growth, margins, were all a bit better than we were anticipating. When you break that down, we had very strong growth within our diagnostics business, both in reproductive health as well as our immunodiagnostics business. On the life sciences side, our software business was down really due to comps and timing, which I am sure we will get into. Our consumables and instruments on the life sciences side both grew in the low single digits, which were in line with our expectations, maybe a smidge below. As we talked about, we built some fairly significant backlog, which should help us here as we move into the back half of the year.

Robert BambergerSenior Research Analyst

Awesome. Has anything changed in your view about Q3 or 2026 in the 6 weeks since reporting Q2?

Steve WilloughbySenior VP of Investor Relations

We are not going to provide any inter-quarter commentary.

Steve WilloughbySenior VP of Investor Relations

Yeah We will leave that for when we report 3Q.

Robert BambergerSenior Research Analyst

Yep, makes sense. Then maybe just starting on life sciences, that is about half of revenue for Revvity. Organic growth went from 3% in the first quarter down to negative 3% in the second quarter. That swing was essentially that 20% software decline, which you mentioned was due to the comp and the contract timing issue, versus anything really demand related there. Life sciences solutions was up low single digits. Maybe just focusing on life sciences solutions, can you walk us through what drove that low single digit growth in the quarter in Q2 between both instruments and reagents?

Steve WilloughbySenior VP of Investor Relations

Sure. So maybe first from an end market perspective, academic and government for us is roughly a quarter of our life science business, so it's about 12% of the total company. That is, I would say, consistently soft, stably soft. Obviously, there were some fairly significant pressures throughout much of last year. So far this year with academic and government, including our outlook for the back half, is that it doesn't really change all that much. It doesn't get much better, it doesn't get much worse. From a pharma biotech perspective, again, the end market was pressured for the last several years, including 2025. The pressures last year, again, were fairly policy induced related. I would say we've started to see some recovery in pharma biotech starting, I would say, in mid to late February, and that recovery has continued through June and July.

Steve WilloughbySenior VP of Investor Relations

I think customers are starting to move back towards more normalized levels of investment spending on the pharma biotech side, particularly amongst the larger customers, which even though we are pre-clinically focused, our products really go into pre-clinical research, the bulk of our revenue goes from those medium and larger-sized pharma companies. As it relates to the actual product lines within instruments, we commented that we exited the second quarter with the strongest backlog we've seen in the last three, four, probably even five years. It's really being driven by one category of instruments so far, which is what's called high-content screening, which we are the market leader in. Where I would say in high-content screening, we sell at the high end, million-dollar instruments, at the mid-range, several hundred thousand dollar instruments.

Steve WilloughbySenior VP of Investor Relations

We came out with a new high-end instrument in late February and it's really taken off. We can probably talk about why that's been, but we saw sort of an inflection, not just a pickup in demand, but an inflection in demand for these systems starting in mid to late May. They typically take us several months to build, and this is a brand new instrument, so it maybe takes us even a little bit longer than normal just given the complexity of a brand new instrument. But we saw that change, and so we didn't get those new products right out the door in the second quarter.

Steve WilloughbySenior VP of Investor Relations

On the consumable side, we actually built even a little bit of backlog in consumables, which is not typically normal, but we had some larger bulk orders that just didn't get done in the second quarter and will get made up here in the third and fourth quarter.

Robert BambergerSenior Research Analyst

Yeah. Maybe just double-clicking on instruments there. You talked about that strongest backlog in 3 to 4 years. What does that actually represent in terms of weeks or dollars? Is there any way to size that? How much should we think about that converting in Q3 and Q4, maybe into 2027?

Steve WilloughbySenior VP of Investor Relations

Yeah. For a variety of reasons, we have not quantified the backlog or book-to-bill, but let's just say orders outpaced revenue.

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Continue the full translated transcript in StockNow.

Access every statement, the English original, and speaker-by-speaker history with StockNow Pro.

View the full transcript with Pro

More recent earnings calls

View earnings calendar