Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Common Stock Morgan Stanley 24th Annual Global Healthcare Conference
Review the key takeaways and the transcript of this earnings call.
Transcript
Preview the first fifteen paragraphs, organized by speaker.
All right. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining us at the Morgan Stanley Global Healthcare Conference. I'm Mike Stoltz, one of the biotech analysts here, and it's my pleasure to introduce David Meeker, President and CEO of Rhythm Pharmaceuticals. Just as a quick reminder, the format for today is a fireside chat, but if anyone in the audience has a question, please raise your hand and we'll try and address it in our discussion. Before we get started, I just need to read a quick disclosure. For important disclosures, please see the Morgan Stanley Research Disclosure website at www.morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures. If you have any questions, please reach out to your Morgan Stanley sales representative. With that, maybe I'll hand it over to David to make some introductory comments. Thanks for sharing your time with us today.
Yeah. Thanks, Mike. Yeah. Just to set the stage on Rhythm a bit, it's a good moment for the company. For those who are following, we like to set the company framework up, getting people to think about three pillars. Obviously, we're working on melanocortin 4 pathway. Our first approved drug, IMCIVREE, first-generation product, was approved in 2020. It's now approved in a couple of genetic, Bardet-Biedl syndrome in 2022, and most recently, HO in the spring of this year. The three pillars we're focused on are a genetic pillar, and we think there's a number of genetic causes of impaired signaling through the melanocortin 4 pathway.
We did the EMANATE trial and the DAYBREAK trials, which were not positive, but they provided us a lot of information and I think gave us a sense of how we are going to tackle that pillar next, which is taking the genes of greatest interest and focusing on trying to determine the variants that have true loss of function, because with that understanding, then you can run those trials with a much higher probability of success. I think we're pretty confident that the biology, of course, is going to work there. The middle pillar is hypothalamic obesity, 10,000 patients, significant opportunity. I'm sure we'll talk a little bit more about that. Launch is underway. The third pillar is Prader-Willi, and we released some preliminary data out of a study, open label study by Dr. Miller using setmelanotide.
We've told the world, which we will update everybody on which assets specifically we'll take into phase III and then try to give people some sense of timeline, some before the end of the year. Prader-Willi is, as I said, third pillar, and it's a significant opportunity. I think we're quite convinced that the biology is real and works there, and we plan to invest accordingly, and so that'll be a major effort for Rhythm going forward in 2027.
Great. Thanks for that introduction, David. Maybe we'll start with the middle pillar, which is HO, and maybe just give us a brief background there, maybe on the disease, the unmet need, and how IMCIVREE helps these patients.
Yeah. HO is interesting. I'll contrast it with Bardet-Biedl syndrome, our first approval in 2022, which is, as I said, about 5,000 patients and really a classic ultra-rare disease. It's a genetic disease. It's a syndrome. These patients have classic ultra-rare disease challenges trying to get to a diagnosis. Very few experts. There was only one center of excellence in the U.S. when we launched. We've now helped the development of about five other centers. But that's a world where you continue to find patients, and you'll continue to find patients for the next decade, two decades. We expect that opportunity to grow and grow steadily, but a modest pace, and it's driven very much by, it just takes time for these patients to come to awareness, and part of the challenge is there's not a concentrated way to tackle that disease.
They are often cared for by primary care physicians. There's no dedicated specialist who's taking care of them. Although they may see any number of specialists and get to a diagnosis, there's not a concentrated point where they're being taken care of uniformly. HO, in contrast, which is this entity most commonly due to occurring when patients who have a tumor in that area of the brain, hypothalamus, and pituitary in that region, they get it resected. These are benign tumors, but in the process of that treatment, resection and/or radiation, the hypothalamus, that part of the hypothalamus gets damaged where this pathway sits, and so they lose the signaling. They have a loss of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, which is the key signaling hormone in this pathway. They literally come off the surgical table hungry and are gaining a pound or two a week. That's a classic presentation post-surgery.
There's a very clear before and after to these patients. Up until now, patients going into surgery, about 80%-85% of them will have one or more hormonal deficiency, hypothyroid, adrenal insufficiency, et cetera. They are educated on that when they go into surgery. The surgical team will tell them, "You may develop hypothyroidism, but we can treat that. We can replace your thyroid medicine. It's okay." As a rule, they are not told that hypothalamic obesity is a possibility, and that occurs in about 50% of the patients. Part of the reason they're historically not told is, A, the surgical team may not be so cognizant of it.
Secondly, even if they are, it's one of those situations where they tell the patient about a potential complication and the patient and their family go, "Okay, so what do we do if that happens?" We do not really have a treatment. You have created a level of anxiety in the patient and their family without being able to give them some reassurance that you have a way of dealing with that. That is the world that we have entered into, really a devastating complication. The beauty of this treatment is in HO, it is really a pure. The drug itself taught us what was the cause of that disease.
It was a little bit, I think there were a number of hypotheses not so clear going into our trials, but the response to a precision medicine, this melanocortin 4 receptor agonist, literally a hormonal replacement, taught the world that that is the underlying biology for this. That is where we are. The team, out of the gate, what has been surprising, as we get a little bit surprising to me, maybe it should not be based on what I just told you, is the level of awareness, even among endocrinologists, is, I would say, modest. It is not like they are taught about this during fellowship training and the like. It is a relatively new disease, back to being defined as much by the medication. The medication has really given definition to that, and defined it as a distinct entity, number one. Number two, many endocrinologists do not like treating obesity.
Obesity treatment has become very much writing scripts for GLP-1s, and so they will manage other endocrine problems, but they-- "I do not do obesity," and they will send the patient to an obesity clinic or some other part of the organization. This part of their disease may well be outsourced, if you will, to another part of the system and the like. We are entering this world where we have got to create awareness. We have got to help create more experts and, like I said, I think there is a prevalent population here, which is out there and not carrying a diagnosis. Those are the classic rare disease challenges. On the upside, this is a classic specialty opportunity. Unlike Bardet-Biedl syndrome, which is dispersed and being cared for maybe by multiple different specialists and/or primary care physicians, these patients will reliably pass through and/or be primarily cared for by an endocrinologist.
As a company, we approach this in a very different way, which is we can cover all endocrinologists. We had a sales force of about 16 people for Bardet-Biedl syndrome because that was not the strategy. We have hired 42 dedicated salespeople for HO because the goal will be to knock on certainly all of the top-tier endocrinologists, which is about half of that 10,000 number as a start. A lot of advantages, some residual challenges, and of course, we are positive about our first quarter.
Yep. Maybe we can talk about the early launch trends.
You shared some promising start forms, so maybe talk about that.
Yeah. At the first quarter, we had about 400-plus start forms that were written by 300 physicians. People ask, "How is that relative to expectations?" Going into a launch, these things are really hard to calibrate, but that was a really positive signal. I think it told us that there was a high level of interest. People were willing to write scripts. The 300 docs who wrote those 400 scripts also tells us that it wasn't a small number of docs who were believers, and the rest of the world not, and that they wrote a disproportionate number. But we have, I think, very broad-based uptake. Since the first quarter, we had The New England Journal of Medicine article published. I think that's the kind of addition to the whole picture that makes a big difference.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Continue the full translated transcript in StockNow.
Access every statement, the English original, and speaker-by-speaker history with StockNow Pro.
View the full transcript with ProCall participants
2 people spoke on this call — only 1 are shown here.
PARTICIPANT LIST
View participant details in StockNow.
Log in to see executives and analysts, their roles, and complete speaking history.
Log in to view all participantsKeep exploring
