Alphatec Holdings, Inc. Wells Fargo 21st Annual Healthcare Conference
Review the key takeaways and the transcript of this earnings call.
Transcript
Preview the first fifteen paragraphs, organized by speaker.
All right. Good afternoon. My name is Ross Osborn, and I'm on the MedTech team here at Wells Fargo. I'm pleased to introduce management from Alphatec for this session. Joining us from the company is Todd Koning, the CFO, and Robert Judd from Investor Relations.
Thanks for being here. Thanks for having us.
Maybe we'll start at a high level. Curious to hear your thoughts on how the spine market's evolved since Q2. We've heard mixed reviews of normal seasonality, other softness, and the status quo. Curious what you're seeing in the field.
Yeah. Thanks again for having us, Ross. I think as you look at how we came out of the quarter, in the first half, I think volumes were 20% in the first half, maybe a little bit north of, and that feels really good for us in terms of the consistent volume number of procedures that we're seeing in the space, and I think the confidence that it gives us going into the second half. Clearly, that's underpinned by a level of surgeon adoption that's in the low 20% range as well, so increasing the net number of new surgeons who are doing procedures with the company growing, and that really is the underlying engine of the business.
First half at 20% plus, I think our guide implies high teens in the second half. I think we like the setup from a procedural volume standpoint going into the second half of the year.
Absolutely. In regard to ACA's subsidy expirations, are you hearing any of the noise in the field related to you guys?
Not particularly. I think as we did some of that math earlier this year, I think we sized our exposure to that population, low single digits percentages. So we just don't think that we're that exposed, I think as we've gone through the year, haven't heard really any noise around that, I think that would then suggest our math earlier in the year was probably correct.
Great. To your point, your volumes are obviously much higher than a traditional spine market. Where do you think you guys are differentiated from that aspect?
Well, if you look at the company's history, I think really how our thesis is, we create clinical distinction, meaning we help surgeons do better surgery. When we do that, we will compel a surgeon to adopt the procedure. I think part of our distinction is in the proceduralization of the experience, meaning we do not sell piece parts. Obviously, that is how you sell and how you create the economic relationship with the hospital. What we are trying to do is create procedures that surgeons can choose to use to treat a pathology in a patient.
Surgeons will think of the patient, understand the pathology, and then ask themselves, "What procedure will I use to treat that pathology?" If we can architect a procedural approach, we are more likely to get more of that revenue share of that procedure, as well as we are higher likelihood of actually creating a procedural experience that delivers a better outcome over time. When you do that, you are going to attract surgeons, and those surgeons will adopt those procedures. When you do that, you can ultimately attract the right sales talent to support that surgeon adoption. When I tie that back to what we are seeing, which is strong volumes and strong surgeon adoption, I think you come to the conclusion that the thesis is working.
Great. Sticking along a similar thought, how much room is left for surgeon adoption versus driving utilization?
Well, if you kind of look at where we are in terms of surgeons who have adopted Alphatec procedures, you would probably come to the conclusion that we are between 25% and 35% penetrated. At that rate, you could grow your surgeons at a 15%-20% clip for a number of years and only get half of the potential surgeon adoption that is available to you. I think there is plenty of years ahead of us of opportunity to continue to grow the number of surgeons who adopt the procedures that we provide.
Great. Then maybe turning to surgical revenue, it grew 17%, while I believe volumes increased 20%. Can you parse out revenue growth versus volume growth and how you expect that to shift throughout the balance of the year and next?
Mm-hmm. As you know, when we look at our surgical revenue, we think about procedural volume, which we've kind of pitched at 20%, and the other half of that equation is the revenue per procedure, which in the second quarter declined year-over-year by about 2.7%. Really, I would say two dynamics going on there. One of those dynamics is mix related, and the other dynamic is really a biologics attachment rate. If you look at the history of the company and the history of our revenue per procedure growth, we've grown substantially over the last number of years. This year, coming into the year, what slowed was our biologics attachment rate, and so we really have not expanded the attachment rate of biologics to our procedures beyond what it was kind of exiting last year.
That's been a bit of a headwind from a year-over-year standpoint. As you look at the other component of that, we've seen some mix headwinds in terms of pricing, which is both our international business and our cervical portfolio have grown faster than our overall average procedurally, and they hold lower revenue per procedure values than our overall average. While they individually are growing, they're at a lower rate than our average revenue per procedure, and so that mixes the revenue per procedure down. That's strong volume, and that's the core of the business, and I'll take that all day long. I think what we're more interested in is really addressing our biologics attachment rate going forward.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Continue the full translated transcript in StockNow.
Access every statement, the English original, and speaker-by-speaker history with StockNow Pro.
View the full transcript with ProCall participants
3 people spoke on this call — only 1 are shown here.
PARTICIPANT LIST
View participant details in StockNow.
Log in to see executives and analysts, their roles, and complete speaking history.
Log in to view all participantsKeep exploring
