InflaRx N.V. Common StockIFRX
Recorded

InflaRx N.V. Common Stock 12th Annual Cantor Fitzgerald Global Healthcare Conference

Review the key takeaways and the transcript of this earnings call.

PeriodFY 0Duration30 minParticipants2

Transcript

Preview the first fifteen paragraphs, organized by speaker.

Steve SeedhouseBiotechnology Equity Research Analyst

It's my pleasure to welcome our next participating company, InflaRx, a company I've known for quite a while. It's a very interesting moment in time for the company, which we'll get into. Can't see you on the webinar. Friedemann, CFO, Thomas, head of IR. I really look forward to the conversation. Maybe off the top, gentlemen, there's been, I don't know, I guess an evolution or a fairly major update to the strategy this year with the decision to advance development into ANCA vasculitis. It was always something that made sense, but now that's been a pretty assertive direction that InflaRx and avacopan, of course, that is being left already in Europe in its withdrawal from the market. If you could talk us through the state of affairs here, what ultimately drove your decision marketplace?

Niels RiedemannCEO and Co-Founder

Absolutely. Well, first of all, thanks Steve, for inviting us. Really thrilled to be here. Great conference so far. Yeah, we did really make a therapeutic shift into the broader renal space with the key focus first and foremost on ANCA vasculitis, followed by some other indications. As you may recall, there was always an interest in ANCA vasculitis, and that is because the research very clearly indicates the role of C5a and C5aR1 in this disease. So there's quite good research. As you also alluded to, there's an accepted path that is used as an approved drug on the C5aR1 inhibition with avacopan. So that was all in the mix. But on top of it, actually Amgen was really also reporting quite good increasing sales, showing to the investors and to the street that this is a real market, which was always a bit in debate.

Niels RiedemannCEO and Co-Founder

As you know, we had for a while in the making a new version of a C5aR1 inhibitor with izicopan, maybe to provide some solutions to some shortcomings that we spotted in avacopan. So this was all there, and all of a sudden, this disease popped back up with the announcement that we're all aware of around potential withdrawal. So we got a lot of interest back in the ANCA vasculitis space. I should let all of you guys here know that while we had done some early studies, phase II studies with vilobelimab, our antibody, we also have the licensed vilobelimab version in China called BDB-001, which is in phase III for non-inferiority pivotal trial. So there's interest. There's clear evidence that the pathway is important. Here we go. We have a very interesting C5aR1 inhibitor that has best-in-class potential. And we have a proven market.

Niels RiedemannCEO and Co-Founder

And we have a situation where in some major markets the current competitor is already withdrawn or on hold and an unclear situation, but also with the situation in the U.S. where the FDA has recommended that withdrawal. So we don't know how this is going to play out, but completely independent of that, with the drug properties that we may speak about, we see either way, if the drug gets pulled or not, advantages, and even if it stays on the market, we think we have a really good competitive molecule to it.

Steve SeedhouseBiotechnology Equity Research Analyst

Yeah. Niels, I want to put you on the spot as a pioneer and somebody who has been working in complement for a long time. I am finding that in my conversations with investors, there are a lot of people maybe that had not followed the development of avacopan and your work in ANCA vasculitis years ago as that was being moved towards market and some of the FDA interaction. They are visiting this space maybe with fresh eyes or even for the first time in many instances. I am sure you are having some similar interactions as you are broadening your conversations. So maybe from the highest level, remind us all why C5aR is the right target and is a proven target at this point in ANCA vasculitis, because I think there is some confusion as to why there is a controversy around avacopan.

Steve SeedhouseBiotechnology Equity Research Analyst

It has a lot to do with data handling and trial design and features of that molecule that are specific to the molecule maybe. But I think the target is quite well-validated and certainly very rational in ANCA, but nobody better to articulate that than you. So would love to just put that over to you.

Niels RiedemannCEO and Co-Founder

No, absolutely happy to cover that a bit. Actually it is also preclinically a very well-researched area. In ANCA vasculitis, ANCAs is an anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. So the word ANCA implies that neutrophils are in the game. And in fact, these ANCA antibodies, they are different subtypes. They are directed against neutrophil structures that are usually inside the cell, but under certain conditions, like viral infections, that they can get on the surface of the cell. So these antibodies bind to these structures, for example, MPO, myeloperoxidase. And what happens when an antibody binds an antigen? Obviously, you activate complement. And you are doing that on the back of the very cell that has the highest density of C5a receptor 1 of all known cells. Plus, other cells have that, you monocytes, macrophages particularly.

Niels RiedemannCEO and Co-Founder

So key cells of the immune response that actually drive damage because they have mechanisms to drive damage, like releasing granular enzymes that are very nonspecific, generating reactive oxygen species that can damage tissue, and undergoing NETosis, which is very well described in ANCA vasculitis. So that very cell gets activated by a mechanism on its back that generates more C5a. So ultimately, it is clear that everybody has almost the first go-tos, like, oh, okay, if you want to stop the damage, block the C5a1 because neutrophils get excited, they will cause damage. They will cause damage right at the vasculature site where they get activated. And in all these preclinical models, it is very clear, for example, if you take C6 knockout mice that cannot assemble the MAC, they are not protected from damage. But if you take C5AR knockout mice, complete protection.

Niels RiedemannCEO and Co-Founder

It is very well established, the role of these innate immune cells in the damage driving mechanism. There is some new research that also suggests an impact on antibody generation from plasma cells that there is new research out just very recently in the public domain. The mechanism could be even broader disease modifying. If you think of in the ANCA vasculitis space, there is always kind of two pillars. The one is contain the life-threatening damage right there that can kill your organ. For that, currently, we use mostly high-dose corticosteroids with terrible side effects. The other pillar is drive down this ANCA antibody production, which is, for example, rituximab targeting, and maybe also to a certain extent, the old drug cyclophosphamide. Until avacopan came around, there was really no alternative to high-dose corticosteroids. The drug is really used to drive down corticosteroids.

Niels RiedemannCEO and Co-Founder

You hear and see that from the responses. We hear that with our KOLs, with our advisors. I think the mechanism is really ideal for a drug like ours. On top of it, I want to mention that the mechanism how renal damage is established by complement activation, there is a lot of good research pointing to C5aR driving that mechanism. It is a very recent publication that shows how acute kidney injury is driven by complement, particularly C5aR, and then how C5aR plays a key role in the transition to chronic renal disease, specifically by fibrosis induction.

Steve SeedhouseBiotechnology Equity Research Analyst

This is measurable in ANCA vasculitis, presumably through the kidney function.

Niels RiedemannCEO and Co-Founder

This is exactly the mechanism that patients suffer. They have this in ANCA, the acute kidney injury.

Niels RiedemannCEO and Co-Founder

Yeah that over time will translate into a chronic renal impact.

Steve SeedhouseBiotechnology Equity Research Analyst

We will definitely circle back to that because that could be relevant in terms of how you are thinking about development strategy. But on the molecule itself, INF904, just in the context of some of the things the FDA in particular and EMA, I think we have similar visibility into some of the issues they have, things like hepatotoxicity they have been concerned about. Can you just highlight some of the pharmacologic advantages INF904 has over avacopan that you alluded to and how this molecule was designed in light of some of the learnings of the first-generation approaches?

Niels RiedemannCEO and Co-Founder

Yeah, happy to do that. So one of the key design issues, and the key advantages that we wanted to cover is a better PK. So avacopan is a very good blocking molecule in vitro. Our molecule, by the way, has almost identical IC50 in vitro in different assays. But in vivo, the uptake in the gut into the system in animals, and in particular in humans seems to be quite difficult. The plasma presence is quite low at the beginning, and it then will, over time, reach steady state after 13 weeks. So we designed our drug to have a much better immediate plasma presence. We reported a tenfold area under the curve increase at the same dose compared to the reported data from avacopan at triple peak.

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Continue the full translated transcript in StockNow.

Access every statement, the English original, and speaker-by-speaker history with StockNow Pro.

View the full transcript with Pro

More recent earnings calls

View earnings calendar