CybinHELP
Recorded

Cybin 3rd Annual Guggenheim Healthcare Innovation Conference

Review the key takeaways and the transcript of this earnings call.

PeriodFY 0Duration26 minParticipants2

Transcript

Preview the first fifteen paragraphs, organized by speaker.

Eddie HickmanAnalyst

Back to the Guggenheim Healthcare Innovation Conference. My name is Eddie Hickman. I am one of the biotech analysts here. I am joined today by Helus Pharma CEO, Michael Halstead. Michael, thank you so much for joining us. Been a big year for the company, lots of changes, so maybe spend a few minutes introducing yourself and telling everyone here a little bit about the company.

Michael HalsteadCEO

Sure. Thank you, Eddie, and thank you everyone for joining us today. Always excited to be here talking about Helus Pharma. The mission of the company is to improve the treatment of mental health conditions. We are currently developing novel serotonergic agonists for various mental health conditions. We have a platform of programs. Our 003 program is deuterated psilocin for the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder. That is in phase III. We have an upcoming readout of our first phase III trial anticipated in later this quarter. We also have a phase II program that is deuterated DMT in development for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Then we have an earlier 005 program, which is a library of preclinical compounds. We think that there is potential there in a number of therapeutic areas, looking to move the lead candidate forward in that program in 2027.

Michael HalsteadCEO

A lot going on with the company. I joined as the CEO in August of this year, and really excited about both the team, all the work that has been done to date, and certainly looking forward to our readout later this quarter.

Eddie HickmanAnalyst

Yeah, very exciting readout coming soon. Obviously, lots of talk on exactly when the data will come, but maybe let us step back a little bit and tell us about exactly who these patients are, what the design of the trial is, and then sort of where you were when you finished enrollment and where you are in the database lock for when we should expect to see some numbers.

Michael HalsteadCEO

Sure. Importantly, this is for the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder. Maybe just a little bit about the disease state. MDD impacts approximately 22 million patients in the United States. Approximately 70% of those patients are on standard of care, so that's your SSRIs, your SNRIs. Of the patients on standard of care, approximately 66% are not getting adequate relief from standard of care. Often they're getting some benefit, but they need additional treatment. The way clinicians approach these patients, they have sort of two options. One is to wash the patients off of standard of care. That can be a four to six-week process, potential withdrawal there, and then start over with a monotherapy approach. Obviously, depression is a complicated disease state, so not every patient responds to monotherapy.

Michael HalsteadCEO

Often, the way clinicians treat these patients is they continue them on standard of care, and then they add a treatment on adjunctively to hopefully move that patient down the path towards remission. To date, there are only five approved adjunctive treatment options. Those are the atypical antipsychotics, and they do have some efficacy, but significant side effect burden. As we look at our 003 program as an adjunctive treatment, really excited about the potential product characteristics that we could see here. Obviously, has to play through in our upcoming phase III readout. But in phase II, saw really significant efficacy, saw durability off of two doses out to a year, and then also saw a very favorable tolerability profile, mild to moderate adverse events, primarily transitory on day of treatment, and you only have a few days of treatment.

Michael HalsteadCEO

Really think that this has the potential to provide significant patient benefit and a great option for clinicians as they're looking to treat these patients following that adjunctive approach. We completed enrollment in July. The process has been proceeding according to our plans. As I say, haven't provided any additional guidance other than we are on track for our expected data readout later this quarter. Certainly excited to get the data and excited to provide it out to the industry.

Eddie HickmanAnalyst

What day in July? Just kidding.

Michael HalsteadCEO

May have gotten that question once or twice.

Eddie HickmanAnalyst

I think a really important thing that you noted there that I want to just sort of zoom in on is the fact that these are adjunctive patients that are not required to fail a certain number of SSRIs, they're not washing off. These are patients that are on a current treatment that may be working for them. They're getting some benefit, but just not all. As we think about that, not just from the patient perspective from this upcoming trial, how should we think about what the placebo rate could be, these remission and response rates, as we compare them to something that might be in TRD or a much more sort of severe depression? Are those sort of easily comparable, or what's different about 003 in that sense?

Michael HalsteadCEO

I think that is important perspective that people do need to keep in mind. This is an adjunctive trial. As you said, every patient in the trial has to be on a stable dose of their antidepressant medications, has to have been stable dose for at least four weeks. They remain on their background therapy throughout the trial, and then 003 is then administered to show an effect on top of that standard of care. You need to look at this in the adjunctive setting. You're trying to show a benefit on top of, for a patient that has already received, is already getting some benefit from standard of care often, as opposed to a monotherapy where the patient is washed off of their antidepressant and started over.

Michael HalsteadCEO

Or the TRD patient population, which that is two or more failures on an antidepressant, very challenging patient population there.

Eddie HickmanAnalyst

How does that treatment paradigm work currently when there are five atypical antipsychotics approved for adjunctive, but there's also Spravato approved for TRD in these treatment centers? How do physicians think about when to add on and when to change gears?

Michael HalsteadCEO

Right. As I said, right now, their only indicated options are the atypical antipsychotics that are indicated for adjunctive use. How we think about this in the case where if we were to be approved for the adjunctive treatment, you have the potential for a clinician to have the option of not only efficacy, but then also long-term durability and a safety tolerability profile that's very favorable. If you have a patient that either is not responding to the atypical antipsychotic that's being administered adjunctively, or that patient can't tolerate the side effects because, of course, the side effect burdens for the atypical antipsychotics, very significant, weight gain, cardiometabolic, tardive dyskinesia, movement disorders, sexual dysfunction. These are significant side effects that really impact patient quality of life.

Michael HalsteadCEO

For a clinician to have the option of an adjunctive treatment with the product characteristics that we hope will translate through in our phase III program, we think could be very compelling, provide a significant patient benefit.

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Continue the full translated transcript in StockNow.

Access every statement, the English original, and speaker-by-speaker history with StockNow Pro.

View the full transcript with Pro

Other earnings calls that day

View calls from this day