Rapport Therapeutics, Inc. Common StockRAPP
Recorded

Rapport Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock TD Cowen 6th Annual Novel Mechanisms in Neuropsychiatry Summit

Review the key takeaways and the transcript of this earnings call.

PeriodFY 0Duration26 minParticipants3

Transcript

Preview the first fifteen paragraphs, organized by speaker.

Joseph ThomeAnalyst

Awesome. Hi, everyone. Thank you for joining us at the 2026 TD Cowen Neuropsychiatry Summit. I'm Joe Thome, one of the senior biotech analysts here on the team at TD Cowen, and it is my pleasure to have with me today two members of the team from Rapport Therapeutics. We have CEO Abe Sisay with us and CFO Troy Ignelzi. Thanks guys for tuning in. To the investors, if you do have any questions specifically for the management team, feel free to put them in your chat box, and we can help work those into the conversation.

Joseph ThomeAnalyst

But maybe just to start off, Abe and Troy, we'll obviously dive into the programs, but you had an analyst day yesterday, ahead of the bipolar data, but maybe just give a little bit of a top-down view of Rapport Therapeutics and what investors should be looking out for, as sort of a state of the business, and then we can go from there.

Abe CeesayCEO

Sure. Thanks, Joe, for the opportunity, and good afternoon, everybody. Rapport Therapeutics is a company that we started through a collaboration between Third Rock and J&J, really to create what we hope to be the leading precision neuroscience company. We have a real scientific foundation that drives not only our lead program, RAP-219, but also our entire discovery focus, and that is the realization and the utilization of receptor-associated proteins. This allows us to have specificity with small molecules in neuroscience that we think is unprecedented. We think we've seen that play out with RAP-219. We're making significant effort across our discovery portfolio as well. We hope to continue to build that pipeline. Specifically, RAP-219 targets a specific receptor-associated protein, TARPγ-8, that is associated with the AMPA receptor. We presented and released unprecedented results in focal onset seizures September of last year.

Abe CeesayCEO

We've continued to update that data set with a presentation at AAN this year that further elucidated the clinical utility of the drug. As you mentioned, Joe, we're on our way to potentially having some bipolar data here in the coming month.

Joseph ThomeAnalyst

Perfect. Maybe that'll be a good place to start, just given the theme of the day, but obviously expecting the data next month. Maybe what gave you the confidence or the interest in studying RAP-219 in bipolar mania? Maybe we'll start there on the profile. Then if you also just want to touch high level on the current unmet need and the indication, because I know there were some interesting takeaways from yesterday, too, on that.

Abe CeesayCEO

Sure. Our approach when we started the company thinking about RAP-219 and the opportunity was always thinking about it as a pipeline and a target, a pipeline and a product potential. We really prioritized a set of indications where we felt the biology took us. First clearly was epilepsy, given what is known about the excitatory process driving seizures, but also the role of glutamate and the AMPA receptor. It was really kind of de-risk pass as we think about the opportunity and the path forward in epilepsy. Really next on the list was bipolar mania specifically. That was based on a few different points of evidence. One, the emerging literature was really supporting the role of glutamate in specific, the manic process.

Abe CeesayCEO

Second was the region of the brain that functional MRI as well as other imaging was showing, which was that glutamate expression was focused in the corticolimbic network, which really overlapped with TARPγ-8 expression. Then the third was a long history of anti-seizure medications being effective therapies for bipolar disorder, both in terms of mania as well as mood stabilization. So it was always kind of a bet that we felt was the right experiment to run as we thought about the opportunity for RAP-219. We were buoyed as we saw the epilepsy results as well, because what we really understood from the epilepsy results is, one, we can confirm target engagement. Two, we felt that we had a tolerability profile that would be, along with efficacy, highly differentiated in bipolar disorder.

Abe CeesayCEO

That really gets to your question around what is the unmet need in this patient population. The first I'll say is it's significant, and it's a large population. We're talking about roughly 1.6 million patients with bipolar I disorder. There has not been much innovation at all for these patients. As you think about the therapies that are available to them, they really are bucketed into three. One are atypical antipsychotics or the dopaminergic pathway. Two is lithium. Then three are a couple approved anti-seizure medications. When you think about this patient population, it's really a high-functioning patient population.

Abe CeesayCEO

Although they do live with bipolar disorder, both in the manic side as well as the depressive side, the reality is they are looking to stay highly engaged in their lives, whether that is their family life, their social life, their work life, whatever it may be. The current available medications and the tolerability profile really takes them away from those things that they need to be engaged in. We really know what the tolerability limitations are of atypical antipsychotics. Those are the extrapyramidal symptoms, the weight gain, metabolic changes, et cetera. Then on the anti-seizure medication side, it is the sedation, somnolence, as well as gait impairment.

Abe CeesayCEO

We saw a really nice opportunity that potentially bringing a novel MOA to bipolar disorder, and one that has a tolerability profile that would be much more appealing to patients and clinicians as they think about staying on a therapy long term.

Joseph ThomeAnalyst

Perfect. You've done some, I guess now several kind of phase I studies across both indications for RAP-219. The titration kind of protocol is a little bit different here than it is for epilepsy, I guess. You're looking at two different ones.

Joseph ThomeAnalyst

Even though at the end they're going to be one-to-one randomization. Can you just walk us through how you found the dose for bipolar and maybe why taking some of the adjustments on dose escalation versus what you saw in FOS patients?

Abe CeesayCEO

Sure. Going into the bipolar study, we had the benefit of a lot of data as compared to going into our phase II study in epilepsy. Going into the phase II study with bipolar, we had the benefit of our human PET study. Clearly, all of our phase I studies, as you mentioned, Joe, which the PET study was one of them. We did not have the PET study when we went into our phase II study for epilepsy, the human PET study. We also had the phase II data from the epilepsy study as we considered dose selection going into the bipolar study. A couple of key aspects here and imperatives for us as we thought about dose selection going into the bipolar study. First was our understanding of receptor occupancy, and really informed by two things.

Abe CeesayCEO

One, what was the maximal efficacy we saw in the corneal kindling model, which is a model of epilepsy, but also can be used as a model to inform bipolar mania, dose selection as well as efficacy. The second was thinking about how that receptor occupancy and PK lined up with a pharmacodynamic effect, and we really were able to glean that from our epilepsy study because we were able to leverage this novel biomarker, which is the long episode or that EEG electrographic data. What we really understood from all of this data is that with RAP-219, we are able to achieve a level of RO as well as a PD effect very early in dosing. In our epilepsy study, we saw that via the electrographic readings within 2 or 3 days of dosing.

Abe CeesayCEO

When we thought about the dose that we take forward in bipolar, we knew what maintenance dose we needed to get to. We also understood by what time did we need to achieve that receptor occupancy. Basically what we did is looked at two titration schemas that are not that different from each other to understand if that had any differentiation in terms of tolerability. We did not go in with any tolerability concerns, but our feeling was any improvement that one can see in tolerability is always a benefit. That was really the rationale to look at those two tolerability, I am sorry, those two titration schemas.

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Continue the full translated transcript in StockNow.

Access every statement, the English original, and speaker-by-speaker history with StockNow Pro.

View the full transcript with Pro

More recent earnings calls

View earnings calendar