Olema Pharmaceuticals Stifel 2026 Healthcare Conference
Review the key takeaways and the transcript of this earnings call.
Transcript
Preview the first fifteen paragraphs, organized by speaker.
Thanks, everyone. Sean, thank you very much for being here. Here we have Olema Oncology CEO, Sean. You guys have had a lot going on, and I feel like we're finally getting to the point where we can actually talk about your data and not someone else's data. Must feel pretty good. Yeah.
We're very confident in the data we've generated to date, and it's a classic question that we have in oncology, which is, are you able to replicate that phase II data in the phase III setting? And obviously in Q1 for OPERA-01, the second line, second, third line study, we will have that readout. OPERA-02, which is the first line study with KISQALI, is enrolling extremely robustly.
Yeah. Can we maybe talk to that before we get into the OPERA-01 stuff?
Yeah. PERSEVERA didn't work out.
SERENA-4 didn't work out. The fact that, I think in the press release on Monday or earlier this week, I can't remember which day it was, but you guys actually said that enrollment is accelerating. Can you speak to why, especially in the wake of some pharma setbacks?
Yeah. Why is that? One thing that you There are a couple reasons for it.
It is absolutely true that persevERA was a negative trial.
Right? It did not meet its hazard ratio. It didn't get its p-value. It is also absolutely true that there's evidence of activity in that trial, right? There are negative trials where you go, "Wow, this really doesn't do anything.
And to be perfectly honest, if that had been the result in persevERA, I think we would have some soul searching to do.
Yeah. I mean, five months kind of was the bar going into it.
Five months is absolutely practice changing.
The challenge is that their hazard ratio missed by a few hundredths, actually. There is clear evidence of activity. Now, there is a design flaw in that trial, and the design flaw is including endocrine-resistant patients. If you look at their tables, that is the TFI treatment-free interval, less than 12 months. Those really aren't first-line patients. Those are endocrine-resistant patients, and they're treated actually as second-line patients in the practice guidelines. Where those patients come from is they received an adjuvant therapy, they stopped that adjuvant therapy, they then went on to develop metastatic disease, but that metastatic disease occurred within the first year of their completion. Those patients generally, as I said, are second line. We don't have those patients in OPERA-02. We never did from the beginning, actually almost no one, because of the treatment guidelines.
Yeah. One thing I think that you have to realize is that, first of all, our phase II data, one year in patients post-CDK4/6 progression, mostly wild type, 30% two prior CDK4/6s.
So our phase II data is compelling. The tolerability from that looks like KISQALI plus AI, so there is not a signal there that has people concerned about giving that combination. Then very simply, the control arm is the global standard of care.
Right? If you go onto this trial, you get randomized between KISQALI plus letrozole, which is the global standard of care, versus KISQALI plus palbociclib, and the investigators are very interested in the data we've seen in the signal, though not positive that persevERA showed.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Continue the full translated transcript in StockNow.
Access every statement, the English original, and speaker-by-speaker history with StockNow Pro.
View the full transcript with ProCall participants
2 people spoke on this call — only 1 are shown here.
PARTICIPANT LIST
View participant details in StockNow.
Log in to see executives and analysts, their roles, and complete speaking history.
Log in to view all participantsKeep exploring
