Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. 2026 Global Healthcare Conference
Review the key takeaways and the transcript of this earnings call.
Transcript
Preview the first fifteen paragraphs, organized by speaker.
Nothing's off the table. Sounds good.
We don't have any slides. Awesome. Thank you all for taking the time to join us today. For those unfamiliar, my name is Jack Allen, and for this session at the Baird Healthcare Conference, we have the Ocular Therapeutix team, and we have Pravin Dugel, the CEO. Thank you so much for taking the time to join us, Pravin.
Jack, thank you for having us here.
I'd like to kick it off with a brief overview of the company, but the CEO tends to do a better job than the analysts. I'll send it over to you for a couple of minutes on Ocular, and then we'll jump into some news. You had some updates this morning.
Ocular Therapeutix is a company based in Bedford, Massachusetts. What we have is a TKI or a tyrosine kinase inhibitor on a proprietary hydrogel platform. The idea is to block a receptor, VEGF, which we know works very well in diseases such as wet macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. There's more than 40 years of data showing that, and tries to solve two problems. The first problem is that of sustainability. We know that despite having a very effective treatment in this country alone, more than 40% of patients drop out in the first year. That's the more obvious problem that we're trying to solve.
The second problem that we're trying to solve is that even in those patients who continue to get treated and happen to be able to come back, after about 2 to 5 years, they inevitably lose vision, and this is probably because of the pulsatile nature of treatment where we give injections every month or every other month, and that causes a thickening and thinning in the back of the eye. Much like a concussion in your brain, which causes scarring and fibrosis. We're trying to achieve a greater degree of sustainability as well as a better long-term outcome by suppressing a known and validated target.
Got it. That's a great overview, and we'll get into the data and all of the background surrounding AXPAXLI. It would be remiss if I didn't jump in with the press release this morning. You're looking to bring AXPAXLI to market in 2027 and file the BLA or NDA- By the end by the end of this year.
You had a positive meeting with FDA that you put out some news before market open today. Maybe could you just overview the updates and your confidence in the ability to file by the end of the year?
Sure. What we've done from the time that this team came in about 2 and a half years ago, is we've been in constant touch with the FDA. Everything we've done is exactly according to FDA guidelines. That's why for SOL-1, our successful phase III study, we have a SPA, a Special Protocol Assessment. From the very beginning, we have discussed with them the possibility of a single trial approval. What they've said has been very clear and very consistent, which is that you need 2 evidentiary standards before the CHART turn and 2 evidentiary standards after the CHART turn to allow for a single trial submission. Those evidentiary standards have never changed in the last few decades. First, you need to have a study. This is before the CHART turn that is properly masked. That means no sham. It doesn't mean that sham can't get approved, but just not with one trial.
So properly masked. The second one is that it has to be properly powered. Now, both of those boxes have been checked officially because we have a SPA, obviously. After the CHART turn, the 2 boxes are, one, the P value has to be less than 0.001, and ours is less than 0.0006. The second is that you have to be able to supply the FDA at the time of the submission with at least 300 patients who've been exposed to the drug for safety reasons only, and we're able to do that. So we checked all the boxes. We are in line with all the evidentiary standards, and in a Type C meeting, we have official confirmation by the FDA that we're able to submit with a single trial.
Part of that process was a pre-NDA meeting, which is really an operational meeting that we said that we would get completed by the third quarter of this year. The press release this morning shows not only that we're doing it in time, but that we're completely aligned with the FDA in order to have our complete submission in the fourth quarter of this year.
That's great context. You touched on the submission. It seems like it's going to be supported by the efficacy data from SOL-1 and then some safety data from SOL-R. Could you just talk a little more about the mechanistic aspects of SOL-1's a closed, maybe there's a long-term follow-up, but the primary evidence from SOL-1 has been unmasked and unblinded, and that's your evidence of efficacy. But then there is a dynamic where you're taking data from an ongoing study with SOL-R.
That's correct. How are you protecting the integrity of that study as you accrue that safety data?
Yeah. That's a fantastic question. Look, SOL-R, the second study, the non-inferiority study, is very important for us for OUS regulatory agencies. As you mentioned, it's vital for us to protect the integrity of SOL-R. The FDA simply wants 300 patients that have been exposed to the drug, and that's true of any study. It doesn't have to be the same target. It could be any other target, any other disease target. It doesn't even have to be the same dose. It can't be a lower dose, but it can be a higher dose. What we needed to do was to get the safety data from approximately 130 patients from SOL-R. Now, we wanted to do that but protect the integrity of the study.
What we're going to be doing is having only the safety data go to a third party who is then going to go ahead and transfer that to the FDA. We'll not be in that chain whatsoever. We'll also take an alpha spending. Arguably, we don't have to take an alpha spending because it's only safety data and it'll be a third party, but we'll take a very small alpha spending anyway to again, protect the integrity of SOL-R. We're doing absolutely everything possible to protect the integrity of SOL-R, not because SOL-R is necessary for FDA approval in the U.S. But we believe that protecting the integrity of SOL-R will be very important for regulatory agencies outside the U.S.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Continue the full translated transcript in StockNow.
Access every statement, the English original, and speaker-by-speaker history with StockNow Pro.
View the full transcript with ProCall participants
2 people spoke on this call — only 1 are shown here.
PARTICIPANT LIST
View participant details in StockNow.
Log in to see executives and analysts, their roles, and complete speaking history.
Log in to view all participantsKeep exploring
